Perspective · Public Health / Government
Switch role

Data sources

Conceptual concept connections only — no systems are integrated.

Illustrative operational scenarios; historical laboratory evidence is identified separately. No live surveillance, integrations or AI models are connected.

Connected illustrative scenario

Riyadh · Klebsiella pneumoniae

Days 1–9 · illustrative reporting cycle · 7 ICU isolates; association does not prove transmission.

Transparent simulated risk workflow

illustrative EHR/EMR context, LIS susceptibility results and prescription records matched by illustrative case ID.

Python · SVM · Logistic Regression · OCR · NLP · HL7 FHIR · institutional APIs: planned only.

Current concept

Local illustrative data, interactive charts, GIS, role switching and scripted intelligence.

Planned AI & analysis

Python, SVM, Logistic Regression, OCR and NLP — not operational models.

Planned interoperability

HL7 FHIR, EHR/EMR, LIS and institutional APIs — no live integrations.

Future security & validation

Institutional governance, access controls, clinical evaluation and external validation before deployment.

Conceptual sources

8

Across three sectors

illustrative records

2.34m

illustrative volume

Quality checks

96.2%

Illustrative score

Pending mappings

14

Mock tasks

EHR / EMR

Conceptual

482k

Daily conceptual cadence

Laboratory systems

illustrative feed

1.28m

Hourly conceptual cadence

Pharmacy systems

Conceptual

316k

Daily conceptual cadence

Public-health systems

Conceptual

84k

Weekly conceptual cadence

Research datasets

illustrative files

48k

Quarterly conceptual cadence

Animal & livestock

Pilot

21k

Monthly conceptual cadence

Environmental sources

Pilot

13k

Monthly conceptual cadence

Open data

illustrative import

96k

Quarterly conceptual cadence

Health information exchange

EHR / EMR

In collaboration with local hospitals and PHCs, the Raqeem programme, the open-data platform, NPHIES and the Sehhaty application.

Laboratory information system (LIS)

Culturing methods and conditions, acute and chronic infectious disease context, isolate and serovar counts.

Clinical data warehouse

Lab databases, wearables and population-wide data.

Wasfaty

An electronic service linking hospitals and PHCs with community pharmacies and tracking patient prescriptions.

External sources

CDC, FDA, research institutions and journals including clinical trials, case studies and articles.

Aligned to ISO/TC 215, ISO 27799:2008, ISO 27000 and SAS70 / SSAE 16, with encryption supporting AES or 3DES at minimum.

SIPOC of the surveillance process

Suppliers

Hospital and PHC resources
Ministry of Health labs
Pharmacies
SFDA

Inputs

Clinical history
Medications discharged
Bacterial tests
Cultures and PCR
Antibiotics dispensed
Imports and distribution

Outputs

Resistance patterns
Cost analysis
Surveillance reporting

Surveillance determinants

Importation and distribution of antimicrobials

  • How many antimicrobials have been imported?
  • How many have been distributed?
  • Which geographical locations received them?
  • Where are antibiotics disposed of?
  • How many are in the market?
  • What is the percentage of revenue and economic waste?

Consumption of antimicrobials

  • Which antimicrobials are consumed by humans and animals?
  • Which antibiotic types and doses are used in out-patient and in-patient settings?
  • What type of institution dispensed them?

Antimicrobial resistance patterns

  • How many infection cases (STI, UTI, URTI, GI, CVS, NMSK)?
  • Which bacterial pathogens?
  • What symptoms and clinical history?
  • What resistance patterns clinically and genomically?
  • What is the length of stay?
  • What demographics and risk factors?

Antimicrobial resistance research

  • Which AMR studies have been implemented across the MENA region?
  • How is each study classified?
  • Which are analytic and which descriptive?

Risk identification

Analysis of resistance patterns

Risk stratification and identification of organisms with their clinical and genomic resistance patterns, monitored and attached to a healthcare system.

Dashboarding

Dashboard data for surveying antimicrobial resistance patterns extracted from higher agencies and ministries.

Consultation

Assisted consultation for hospitals and PHCs so antimicrobials suit the patient at population and individual level.

Recruitment

Data recruited passively at first, with workforce capacity building following analysis.

Robotic process automation

Software robots centralise and streamline workflows, saving time and resources on data transfer and analysis. Alert automation supports outbreak investigation with quick scalability.

Planned dashboard scope

  • Data analysis of resistant pathogens and antimicrobials used by infection category (STD, UTI, RTI and others)
  • Analysis of each hospital and PHC on the application and implementation of stewardship
  • Antimicrobial utilisation dashboard (DDD) with demographic and geographic data
  • Prescription patterns of antimicrobials by region and healthcare setting
  • Saudi Arabia heatmap case study: spatial distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1998–2015, 15,791 isolates), Enterobacteriaceae (1998–2015, 11,196 isolates) and Acinetobacter baumannii (2005–2015, 5,312 isolates)

Documented local data limitations

Availability of local data

Data is unavailable or unprocurable due to weak local surveillance in healthcare and farm settings.

Limitations

Techniques rely on traditional methods rather than data mining or deep learning.

Representation

Data is not representative and excludes emerging AMR reporting.

Description

Data is not fully descriptive, so risk stratification is limited.

Genome sequencing

Data does not measure genetic resistance patterns; a genomic bank is necessary.

Competitiveness

No grants or incentives are provided for countries with the best care practices.

concept
EHR, laboratory, pharmacy, public-health, research and One Health systems shown here are conceptual. No live connection or data transfer occurs.

Operational values are simulated. Historical records and source-listed forecasts retain their original attribution; they are not measured GermQ outcomes.